My 21st October appearance at the Investigation Bureau and subsequent interrogation by the prosecutor left me in a daze. The prosecutor asked me about my work for the people's party and how I was paid by my employer, Wood, and why contractor CK Chen used his political donations to offset Wood's expenses. I explained that CK Chen's political donations were used to pay my salary, which was part of the employment agreement between Wood and the people's party. The prosecutor seemed shocked and asked why CK Chen went through the middleman when he could have directly hired me. I replied that CK Chen was worried about potential labour disputes and wanted to avoid any complexities. The prosecutor then asked me about my work for the people's party, and I refused to disclose the details, citing the right to secret communication between the defendant and his lawyers. The prosecutor seemed to be resistant to the idea that the defendant had the right to keep his work private and seemed to be making a moral judgment about the situation. Throughout the interrogation, I felt that the prosecutor was trying to impose his own moral standards on the situation rather than focusing on the facts. The prosecutor's methods and approach left me with a sense of unease and I wondered if this was an indictment of the prosecutor's attitude towards the people's party.