The recent measures to prohibit irregular dining have sparked widespread debate and discussion. While some argue that these restrictions are necessary to maintain social order and promote public health, others claim that they infringe upon individual freedoms and stifle cultural expression. However, it is essential to distinguish between irregular dining and all dining. Irregular dining refers to excessive or uncontrolled eating habits that can lead to negative consequences for one's health and well-being. On the other hand, all dining is a fundamental aspect of human life, essential for sustenance and nourishment. By prohibiting irregular dining, we are not banning all dining, but rather promoting a balanced and responsible approach to eating. This distinction is crucial in understanding the intent behind these measures and the potential impact on our society. As we move forward, it is essential to strike a balance between individual freedoms and collective well-being, ensuring that our actions promote a healthy and harmonious community.