Comparison of Cloudflare R2, AWS S3, Cloudinary, Sanity IO, Supabase storage, and GCP Cloud Storage for Image Storage

This article compares the features and prices of six image storage services: Cloudflare R2, AWS S3, Cloudinary, Sanity IO, Supabase storage, and GCP Cloud Storage. The comparison includes the following aspects: image optimization, object storage, CDN acceleration, and pricing.

Each service is evaluated based on its performance in these areas, with pros and cons listed for each. The comparison table shows the features and pricing of each service, as well as its strengths and weaknesses.

Key features of each service include:
* Cloudflare R2: provides basic image processing APIs, compatible with S3 API, low storage fees, and global CDN acceleration
* AWS S3: offers mature object storage with rich features, Amazon CloudFront CDN acceleration, and competitive pricing
* Cloudinary: provides powerful image processing capabilities, supports WebP and adaptive images, and has a self-contained CDN
* Sanity IO: offers image processing APIs, supports WebP and adaptive images, and has a self-contained CDN, with a moderate price range
* Supabase storage: provides basic image processing functionality, is an open-source Firebase alternative with storage capabilities, and requires manual configuration of CDN
* GCP Cloud Storage: is similar to AWS S3, with rich features, Google Cloud CDN acceleration, and competitive pricing

Ultimately, the choice of image storage service depends on the specific needs of the user, including budget, performance requirements, and desired features.